In reaction to Artefacture’s T-Shirt “Design Will Save The World” Frank-C on Flickr posted this:
His comment is this:
Pardon my French. Really, I’m not usually such a potty mouth.
Is anyone else thinking this?
I saw a t-shirt tonight, and the whole mentality of it just ticks me off.
www.allfavourites.com/art-dwstw-t-shirt.htmI’ve seen the sentiment in other places. I think it’s misleading and primarily flawed; it’s inaction cleverly disguised as action. If you want to save the world, start by saving what’s prevalent in it: people. Help them. Love them.
Rant over.
First off, I think this would make a great T-Shirt, I would certainly wear either one depending on how I was feeling. I actually don’t agree that the
I certainly don’t share Frank’s vehement opposition to the “Design Will Save The World” concept, but I don’t necessarily take it quite as seriously or as literally as him I guess. I believe that design is an activity that can bring great change in the world. It of course depends on your definition of design but the design of irrigation systems, or mechanical pumps, the kind of stuff that Dean Kaman works on are all positive contributions to the world. I think I need a shirt that says “Typography Will Save The World” now that might be some pretentiousness to get angry about.
This post is tagged controversy, design


Add New Comment
Viewing 9 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
thats really great
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
This new one on the other hand, holy balls would I buy that so fast. Put it on a darker tone and you have my dollars.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
The first shirt is not my cup of tea, and the second design makes my cup runith over. It's good to know that somewhere in the realm of pretentious, over-thought and over paid design work there are still some believers that acknowledge the fact they are really just shills for the advertising companies. At least someone didn't sleep through art history class...
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
http://www.core77.com/blog/featured_items/proje...
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
I think there are a lot of better places to go and rant.
Printing this text on an organic t makes an important statement: green and social awareness do not always have to be ugly... or negative.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Design - in the broadest sense; not specifically someone who creates art - can actually materially contribute to saving the world. If a product doesn't work as advertised, it becomes landfill more quickly. If a product is made from nasty materials because the designer doesn't know any better, it will come back to haunt all of us. Bad design can also cause broken bones, blindness and long-term illness. This is not an overstatement, just fact.
And let's use your suggestion to work in a soup kitchen as a comparison of how effective it might be in relationship to a well-designed product. In a soup kitchen you are giving your two hours to feed (in direct relationship) up to maybe 60 people. Maybe more, but not 500. If a designer chooses to use a bio-plastic and renewable, farmed wood instead of petroleum-based plastic and trees cut down from a badly managed forest, he might help - admittedly indirectly - actually save thousands of lives.
Even a simple instance in which a seasoned design engineer takes an existing product, re-engineers it for simpler production and waste reduction can make a huge difference in the use of our resources. Check out V2 of the BoGo solar flashlight (http://www.bogolight.com/) for an example.
Frank, buddy, grow up.